Toni Morrison
Song of Solomon Hirsch, Marianna. "Knowing Their Names: Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon." in Smith, New Essays, pp. 69-92. [R. 5 This is a fruitful essay.] "'The fathers may soar / And the children may know their names' -- the novel's epigraph raises the novel's central themes: family relations, flight, transmission, origin, knowledge, naming, transcendence, contingency." (73)Lubiano, Wahneema. "The Postmodernist Rag: Political Identity and the Vernacular in Song of Solomon." in Smith, New Essays, pp. 93-116. [R] "This text's structure is finally signifying at its most surgical: it refuses to make itself easily understood." (102) [This essay does the same, although the second half is much better than the first.]Middleton, Joyce Irene. "From Orality to Literacy: Oral Memory in Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon" in Smith, New Essays, pp. 19-39. [R. 2- ?] "The bath secene signifies Milkman's cultural immersion in a black, traditional oral culture." (23) [Nothing in this essay suggests how Sweet represents traditional black culture, nor is there much orality involved in the way that Milkman and Sweet bathe each other. Middlleton regularly stretches to touch the point she is attempting to make.]Mobley, Marilyn Sanders. "Call and Response: Voice, Community, and Dialogic Structures in Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon." in Smith, New Essays, pp. 41-68. [R. 1] [Mobley appears to be more interested in showing that she has read the literary theorists (Bakhtin, Culler, Foucault, Lacan) than she is in the novel.] Smith, Valerie. ed. New Essays on Song of Solomon. Cambridge University Press, 1995. (PCT Library PS3563 .08749 S636 1995) [R, Essays listed under their authors' names] "Recent debates about the litarary canon (the body of works historically and commonly considered great) have held the notion of universality up to heightened scrutiny. Defenders of the traditional canon typically argue that texts historically judged as great meet timeless artistic criteria, standards that transcend constructions of race, gender or ethnicity. When challenged to defend the practice of largely excluding literature written by people of color and by white women, they accuse revisionists of confusing politics or demographics wiht literary standards. Those who would enshrine U.S. literary history as it has commonly been written thus deny that the predominance of white male writers bespeaks a set of class or political interests." (1) [strawman fallacy???] |