Prepositional phrases are relatively easy to learn. Simply put, a prepositional phrase is a preposition plus whatever answers the question "What?" after it. The following list includes most of the words
that can function as prepositions:
Having found a word on the list in a passage, form a question with that word followed by "what," i.e., "since what?" If whatever in the sentence answers that question forms a sentence of its own, the construction is not a prepositional phrase: The sun hasn’t shone since we arrived. Otherwise, it is: The sun hasn’t shone {since our arrival.} Your brain already knows what prepositional phrases are. It has to, since you use these phrases correctly day in and day out. What you are trying to do here is to make that unconscious knowledge conscious so you can understand how prepositional phrases fit within sentence patterns. You will, of course, make some mistakes, but you are expected to. Prepositional phrases can become complicated when they involve other constructions. As you learn about these constructions, the prepositional phrases that involve them will become clearer. The majority of prepositional phrases, however, are relatively simple. Another reason for beginning with prepositional
phrases is that they account for so many syntactic connections. Here, for
example, is how E.B. White describes the road to "The World of Tomorrow":
Here is the same passage with the prepositional phrases marked.
Admittedly, this sentence is exceptional: sixty of its sixty-five words are in prepositional phrases. My research indicates that the norm for professional writing is 38%, not 92%. What this means, however, is that simply by identifying all the prepositional phrases in a passage, you will have accounted for more than one third of the syntactic connections in it. YOU WILL BE ONE-THIRD OF THE WAY TOWARD OUR GOAL!
Advanced Issuesthe seven additional constructions. Little words cause the biggest problems. For students who cannot identify verbs, the difference between "to" as a preposition and "to" as the sign of an infinitive can be a real headache. Remember that you are expected to make mistakes. This is one area where they are expected. As you work your way through the levels, you will become more familiar with verbs and will find this distinction easier to make. Unfortunately, this "exception," i.e., that "to" plus a verb is an infinitive, itself has an exception: if the verb functions as a gerund (almost always ending in "-ing"), you ARE dealing with a prepositional phrase:
She returned {to the house}. He likes every sport {from table tennis} {to hunting}.
They went to help the victims. To err is human. Some people consider "than" to be a subordinate conjunction, not a preposition. A complication occurs because the ending of the subordinate clause is usually not stated (It is ellipsed.), or so say the grammar books. Consider: He runs faster than I. Traditional textbooks tend to claim that this means: He runs faster than I *run fast*. I'd like to know how the writers of the textbooks know that. Since I always ran slow, I certainly would not have meant that. Some grammarians would counter by saying that the sentence actually means: He runs faster than I *run*. Another example, however, suggests that that argument doesn't work either. "Sally is prettier than Sarah" does not mean "Sally is prettier than Sarah is [exists]." (The adjective preceding the "than," in other words, has to remain part of the equation.) Nor does it have to mean that either woman is pretty. Most people's minds probably often process
"than" as a preposition. Thus we would hear "Sally
is prettier than me." and "He runs faster
than me." While we are working on prepositions, I let students analyze
these as prepositional phrases. I don't encourage it; instead, I simply
ignore what they do with "than." If students ask, I do say that it is o.k.
to consider it a prepositional phrase, but I note that there is a complication
with the word "than." In my own research, I would mark "than me" as a prepositional
phrase.
When we get to clauses, we face the problem. A cute young woman once wrote: This causes a problem because the ellipsis doesn't work right. Since "me" is in the objective case, the sentence means Anyone can train a horse better than *anyone can train* me. I could picture the young men in the course imagining how they would
try to train her. But since we are now working with clauses, students are
able to see the ellipsed clause structure. And, since our analysis ALWAYS
depends on meaning, students can decide for themselves whether they are
dealing with a prepositional "than" or an ellipsed subordinate clause.
|
|||||||||
This border is a reproduction of 1908, oil on canvas, Rose Family Collection Carol Gerten's Fine Art http://metalab.unc.edu/cgfa/ [For educational use only] Click here for the directory of my backgrounds based on art. |