Last Updated June 11, 1999
 


Palimpsests

      The term "palimpsest" refers to something that has been written over more than once, as in old parchments or clay tablets that were written on (by scratching on them), then "cleaned" by being what we would now refer to as sandpapered, and then written on again. Often, the old writing was somewhat visible under the new. I like to think of some sentences as involving palimpsests.
      If you are just learning to recognize S/V/C patterns, don't worry about palimpsests. They are relatively rare, and when one appears in an exercise on this site, you will be linked back to this page. But if you are comfortable with S/V/C patterns, you may want to spend a few minutes thinking about palimpsests -- for they involve sentence structure and meaning. A palimpsest is a meaningful layering of one basic sentence pattern over another. 
     Consider the sentence:

The children ran wild around the house.
We can analyze this sentence in one of two ways. We can say that "ran" is a verb and "wild" is an adverb that modifies "ran" (just as we say that "slow" is an adverb to "go" in "Go slow."). This would give us an S/V (child ran) pattern. Because "wild" is not a noun, we do not have an S/V/PN or S/V/DO pattern, but what about an S/V/PA pattern? To get a normal S/V/PA pattern, we have to be able to take the verb, ask "what?" after it, and get a sensible answer, as in "The house is green." But in the meaning in which it is used here, "Ran what?" is not a sensible question (as it would be, for example, in "ran the office".)
     This where the palimpsest comes in. Why can't we look at this as two patterns embodied in one simple sentence? We have the S/V pattern (children ran") and under it we have the S/V/PA pattern (children *were* wild). I like this explanation because it shares the meaning of "wild" between the "ran" and the "children." In other words, if we look at "wild" simply as an adverb to "ran," it tells us about how the children ran, but not about the children themselves. But if that were all the writer meant, then the writer might well have written "The children ran wildly around the house." In effect, the palimpsest pattern allows the writer to make two statements in one -- "The children ran wildy." and "The children were wild." They do not mean the same thing.