The term "palimpsest" refers
to something that has been written over more than once, as in old parchments
or clay tablets that were written on (by scratching on them), then "cleaned"
by being what we would now refer to as sandpapered, and then written on
again. Often, the old writing was somewhat visible under the new. I like
to think of some sentences as involving palimpsests.
This where the palimpsest comes in. Why can't we look at this as two patterns embodied in one simple sentence? We have the S/V pattern (children ran") and under it we have the S/V/PA pattern (children *were* wild). I like this explanation because it shares the meaning of "wild" between the "ran" and the "children." In other words, if we look at "wild" simply as an adverb to "ran," it tells us about how the children ran, but not about the children themselves. But if that were all the writer meant, then the writer might well have written "The children ran wildly around the house." In effect, the palimpsest pattern allows the writer to make two statements in one -- "The children ran wildy." and "The children were wild." They do not mean the same thing. |