|
|
|
|
|
1 William Shakespeare wrote Hamlet [Titles] the play, in the sixteenth century. This play displays a lot of foils in it. You might ask yourself, what is a foil? A foil is a minor character in a literary work that uses [?] similarities and differences to help characterize the main character. There are two important foils in this play.
2 One of the foils in the play is Laertes. He [Who?] compares Laertes to h[H]amlet by using similarities. Laertes (Polonius’ son) is similar to h[H]amlet in that they both want to revenge their fathers. They felt that it was their duty to revenge their fathers in honor of them. Both of them mourn their father's death. They both also care a bout [sic] the well being of Ophelia. Ophelia is Laertes['] sister but also his friend. Hamlet cares for Ophelia by telling her that he loves her. He tries to protect her[,] but in reality he does. [?] Hamlet and Laertes are both system breakers. Laertes doesn’t do what his father tells him to do. Hamlet doesn’t care what he doesn’t care what [sic] he is suppose[d] to do or act like, being the prince in [?] all.
3 He also uses differences to describe Hamlet. One of the differences is the way they go about revenging their fathers. When Laertes found out about Hamlet killing his father[,] he went right after him. When Hamlet found out who killed his father, he takes a round about way of going about revenge. He puts on a play that portrays the way his father was supposedly killed to see his stepfather[' H=50]s reaction to it. Laertes was also different in that he was against Ophelia seeing Hamlet because he knew that Hamlet was suppose[d] to marry of higher blood. Hamlet was all for seeing Ophelia because he loved her, even though he was supposed to marry of higher blood.
4 The other foil is Cla[u]dius. Cla[u]dius (the new king) is a foil to Hamlet. The similarities they have helps [SV] characterize Hamlet. One similarity is that they are both devious. Cla[u]dius goes behind Hamlet’s father’s back and sees Gertrude [Evidence?] and in the pact with Norway. [?] Hamlet goes behind Cla[u]dius’ back and exposes his uncle’s killing of Hamlet’s father by putting on a play. They both loved Gertrude. Cla[u]dius loves Gertrude as a lover and Hamlet loves her as a mother. They both use their friends. Cla[u]dius uses Hamlet’s friends to try to get out of Hamlet what is upsetting him. Hamlet uses Horatio to get information and to run errands. [Nice point of comparison] They also both dislike each other Cla[u]dius dislikes Hamlet because he thinks that Hamlet is a spoiled rotten brat, being that he is the king’s only son. Hamlet dislikes Cla[u]dius because of him killing his father and his marriage to his mother.
5 Shakespeare also characterizes Hamlet by using their differences. One of the differences is their ethics. Cla[u]dius is for Cla[u]dius and no one else. He has feelings for no one but himself. [Doesn't he have feelings for Gertrude?] Hamlet cares about other’s feelings[,] and he is for the people. [Evidence?] Cla[u]dius is evil[,] and Hamlet is good. Cladius is evil because he is trying to deceive everyone, and because he killed the king. Hamlet is good because he tries to protect and help people (especially Ophelia).
6
In the two explained foils[,] Shakespeare
describes Hamlet’s personality. Through Cla[u]dius
and Laertes’ personality[,] one finds more
out about Hamlet. One finds that Hamlet’s personality is very complex.
He is a very caring, smart and brave person. This is the reason that Shakespeare
used Laertes and Cladius to describe Hamlet.
|
I. Intro and thesis
II. Laertes
2. Ophelia 3. system breakers
2. Ophelia
2. Gertrude 3. dislike each other
2. good & evil |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Audience (20) |
|
|||
0 - 5 | 4 | The essay has a good introductory paragraph. | ||
0 - 5 | 3 | The essay includes a brief definition (not in the introduction) of foils, such that a student who had not previously heard the term would understand both the concept and this essay. | ||
0 - 5 | 5 | The essay does not simply retell the play. | ||
0 - 5 |
|
|
The essay has a good concluding paragraph. | |
Thesis (20) | - / 15 | |||
0 - 4 | 3 | The thesis is recognizable, somewhere near the beginning of the essay. | ||
0 - 4 |
|
|
The thesis and essay reflect good, independent thought about Hamlet. | |
0 - 4 | 4 | The thesis and essay reflect at least an average understanding of foils. | ||
0 - 4 | 4 | The essay reflects at least an average understanding of foils in Hamlet. | ||
0 - 4 | 1 | The essay reflects an above average understanding of foils in Hamlet. | ||
Organization (20) |
|
|||
0 - 4 |
|
|
Topic sentences relate paragraphs to the thesis. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Paragraphs are generally eight to ten sentences long. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Major and minor points in the outline are logically arranged. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
The essay is accompanied by a typed formal outline with subdivisions to the level of capital letters, i.e., II B. The paragraphs in the essay have been numbered and the numbers of the paragraphs have been placed in parentheses next to the corresponding part of the outline. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Paragraphs reflect subdivisions of major points. (For example, more than one paragraph is devoted to a single foil.) |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Details (20) (Please fill
in the blanks.)
[Note: This rubric assumes that you will discuss at least two foils and be graded on the two you choose. You may discuss only one foil and use the same grades for both sections of this form.] |
|
|||
0 - 3 |
|
|
An explanation of similarities establsihes __Laertes____ as a foil to ______Hamlet__________. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The differences between foil #1 (above) and __Hamlet____ and their significance to the play are explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The function of foil # 1 as a listener on stage (and its significance to the play) is explained in detail. | |
0 - 1 |
|
|
The relevance of foil # 1 to the thesis is explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
An explanation of similarities establsihes ___Claudius___ as a foil to ____Hamlet_. [This grade is too low. It should be a three.] | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The differences between foil #2 (above) and __Hamlet___ and their significance to the play are explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The function of foil # 2 as a listener on stage (and its significance to the play) is explained in detail. | |
0 - 1 |
|
|
The relevance of foil # 1 to the thesis is explained in detail. |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Style (20) |
|
|||
0 - 3 | 2 | Words are used correctly and accurately. | ||
0 - 2 | 2 | There are no (few) errors in usage. | ||
0 - 2 | 2 | Pronouns are used correctly. | ||
0 - 2 | 2 | Verb forms and tenses are used correctly. | ||
0 - 3 | 3 | All sentences are comprehensible. | ||
0 - 2 | 1 | Sentence structure is mature and varied. | ||
0 - 3 |
|
|
There are no (few) sloppy errors. "supposed" | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
Punctuation marks are used correctly. | |
Minus Style Penalty Points (May be regained by correcting errors) |
|
|||
Basic Grade for the Essay (100) | - / 73 | |||
Penalty Points: - __________ Late -___________ Other | - | |||
Bonus points (6 possible) | ||||
0 - 2 |
|
|
Brainstorming | |
0 - 2 |
|
Outlining | ||
0 - 2 |
|
Revision | ||
Final Grade for the Essay | - / 73 | |||
Hostage Fifty:
|
Student's Comments: (You can also use the back of either page.)
[The grades
for this paper may be comparatively low. Objectively speaking, I would
say that the final grade for this paper is exactly right, but some papers
of comparable quality got higher grades. What happened, I think, is the
exact opposite of what happened with paper #627.
In this case, however, I felt that the student had good potential but wasn't
trying very hard. That suspicion was confirmed by the logs. This student
recorded less than half the time recorded by the writer of #627, but it
was also evident in the fact that the grading sheet was not done and the
paragraphs weren't numbered.
My frustation with
the student probably accounts for the "0" in the fourth item for organization.
The outline was hand-written, and the paragraphs in the essay were not
numbered. When I got to this section, instead of checking to see if they
matched correctly, I just said to myself, "If the student doesn't care,
why should I?" Other students did the same thing, but got more points for
this item. All I can say is that, if the student had followed the simple
directions correctly, I would not have had the opportunity to vent my frustration
on this item.]
NOTE: Revising = RV. Remember: use only one code per entry. (See Instructions.)
I used a word-processor _____while drafting __x___ while revising __x___
to type my paper.
Date: | Code | Started | Stopped | Minutes | Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process | Minutes | % of Total |
Brainstorming |
75
|
23
|
Read/Research |
0
|
0
|
Outlining |
20
|
6
|
Tutoring Center |
0
|
0
|
Drafting |
85
|
26
|
Revising |
70
|
22
|
Editing |
30
|
9
|
Grading |
0
|
0
|
Typing |
45
|
14
|
Total |
325
|
= 5.4 hours |