Identifying Verb Phrases - (Modal)
1. "I can buy pen (DO), ink (DO), and paper (DO)?" | 2. No man could have said, that night [NuA], any more (DO) [Adv. [#1] than Mr. Jarvis Lorry could]. | 3. I dare not confide {to him} the details (DO) {of my projects}. | 4. "He may not have known {of it} beforehand," [Inj. [#2] said Mr. Lorry]. | 5. She must have told his brother (IO). | 6. Their escape might depend {on the saving} {of only a few seconds} [#3] here and there. | 7. Why need you tell me (IO) [DO what [#4] I have not asked]? | 8. We ought to have six score (DO) a day [NuA]. | 9. Your suspense is nearly ended (P), my darling [#5] ; | he shall be restored (P) {to you} {within a few hours}; | I have encompassed him (DO) {with every protection}. | I must see Lorry (DO). | 10. "[Adv. to "don't be" If I should prowl {about the streets} a long time [NuA],] *you* don't be uneasy (PA); | I shall reappear {in the morning}." | 11. I had better not see her (DO). | 12. Some {of us} will have a secret attraction (DO) {to the disease}. | 13. It
would seem to be always
the same
question (PN).
|
2. Although the quotation can be considered the direct object of "said," the preferred KISS explanation here is to consider this clause as an interjection. See KISS Level 3.2.3 - Interjection? Or Direct Object? 3. Because they rarely analyze real sentences, grammar textbooks do not discuss cases like this. Grammarians would probably debate whether the "of only a few seconds" phrase should be considered an adverb to the verbal "saving," or as an adjective to "the saving" as a noun. It's not a major matter of importance. 4. This "what" functions simultaneously as a subordinating conjunction and, within its clause, as the direct object of "have asked." 5. "Darling" here functions as Direct Address. See KISS Level 2.3 Adding Three Level Five Constructions. |