Last Updated June 29,1999
 
 


Conjunctions -- And the Punctuation of Clauses


     A "junction" is simply a place where things come together. The prefix "con" means "with," so a "conjunction" is, in one sense, a place where one thing joins with another. Grammatically, the term has become the name of a relatively small group of words that join clauses. Because we are interested in simplicity and in function, I want to include in this discussion the punctuation marks which serve the same purpose.


Joining Main Clauses 

Using Coordinating Conjunctions

     "Ordinate" refers to rank, and "co" means "with," so "coordinating conjunctions join clauses that rank with each other, i.e., they are usually both main, and the ideas in them are approximately equal in level of importance. Perhaps the most common way of joining two such clauses is to use ", and" ", or" or ", but":

We went to the store, and we bought ice cream.
She went swimming, or maybe she went fishing.
I am old, but I am young at heart.
"Or," of course, can be expanded to "either ... or," or "neither ... nor," and "but" is sometimes expanded to "not only ... but also."

     Note that these conjunctions can be used to join two or more subordinate clauses: "She said [that he was late], and [that she no longer wanted to go]. The important point to remember is that they "CONjoin," i.e., join elements of equal grammatical value.

Using a Semicolon, Colon, or Dash

     Main clauses can also be joined by a colon, a semicolon, or a dash. Good writers use the semicolon to emphasize contrast:

Most men like to be fed; many women like to feed.

The semicolon invites the reader to see and think about the differences between the two statements. As I tell my students, the semicolon brings us back to the level of Sesame Street's very important emphasis on "same and different." Note that the punctuation mark itself  (a period over a comma) can help you remember its function.

     The colon and dash are also used to communicate a logical relationship -- they make a distinction between the general and the specific. As in the preceding sentence, a general statement is made. The colon or dash indicates that what will follow will be a more detailed explanation of the same idea:

He's rich -- he's got five million.
It's cold -- it's ten below and windy.
He was arrested: he was charged with murder.

The difference between the colon and dash is entirely one of style and tone. The dash is generally considered to be casual, whereas the colon tends to be used in more formal writing.


Subordinate Conjunctions

The following words may function as subordinate conjunctions:

    after, although, as, because, before, except, for, if, like*,  since, when, where, while, that, what, who, how, why, which, until, 'til, whenever, wherever, whatever, whoever, whichever, whether, but (when it means "except")
The words "so" and "for" are special cases. "So" can function as either a coordinating or as a subordinating conjunction. If it has a small "s" and is preceded by a comma, it probably should be considered a subordinate conjunction:

He wanted candy, [so I gave him some.]

We can easily consider this "so" clause as an adverbial statement of result. But "So" at the beginning of a sentence functions as a coordinating conjunction for the simple reason that the period preceding it has signaled a dump to long-term memory, and thus the "main" clause to which it would be atached is no longer in STM:

He wanted candy. So I gave him some.

    When it is used as a conjunction, you can consider "for" as either coordinating or subordinating. As with "so," the KISS approach is to consider it as coordinating when it is capitalized at the beginning of a sentence, and as subordinating when it is not capitalized and is preceded by ", "

For a theoretical discussion of "so" or "for," click on the words.


Punctuation, Meaning, and Style

     Consider the following two statements:

He went swimming. She did the dishes.

As they stand, they are two equally important, separate statements of fact. We could, if we wish, join them with ", and":

He went swimming, and she did the dishes.

This, however, still leaves us with two equally important, separate statements of fact. Conceivably, we could join them with ", but":

He went swimming, but she did the dishes.

The "but" changes the relationship by indicating a contrast between what he did, and what she did. A subtler, and perhaps stronger way of indicating this contrast is to use a semicolon:

He went swimming; she did the dishes.

Experienced readers will, I suggest, read the semicolon as an invitation to contemplate the differences expressed in the two main clauses. Whereas the ", but" tends to indicate a simple contrast of facts, the semicolon is more likely to lead readers to underlying implications: there is is again -- the men having fun while the women do the work.

     Whereas the ", and" ", but" and the semicolon conjoin the simple sentences as equals, we could use a subordinating conjunction to make one of the two statements relatively more important than the other. If he is the focus of the discussion, we might write:

He went swimming, while he did the dishes.
or
Before she did the dishes, he went swimming.

On the other hand, if she is the focus, we would be more likely to write:

When he went swimming, she did the dishes.
or
She did the dishes after he went swimming.

Punctuation is not simply a matter of etiquette -- it affects meaning. (For a related discussion, see MIMC.)


Readers' Expectations

     As I suggest in the psycholinguistic model of how the brain processes language, good readers develop expectations about what is, or is not, probably coming in a sentence. A period, for example, unless it follows an abbreviated title (as in "Ms.") indicates to a reader that no more words should be coming that belong with the main clause that is currently in short-term memory. Thus the period signals the reader to dump the contents of STM to long-term memory thereby clearing STM for the next main clause. Subordinate conjunctions and punctuation marks affect a good reader's expectations.

Subordinate Conjunctions

     Once STM has been cleared, a good reader's brain is unconsciously, but decidedly looking for the subject of the next MAIN clause:

While he was sleeping, she watched TV.
The "while" in this sentence not only functions as a subordinate conjunction, it also warns the reader not to take the upcoming S/V/C pattern (in this case, "he was sleeping") as the main pattern to which everything is chunked. Generally speaking, we are so accustomed to this process, that it does not seem important, or perhaps even true, but note what happens in the following:
She knew [he was sleeping].
That he was sleeping did not bother her.
In the first sentence, the subordinate conjunction "that" could be inserted, but it is not necessary for the simple reason that we are so accustomed to processing clauses as direct objects after verbs like "knew" that, when we read "he," we automatically take it as a subject of a subordinate clause. In the second sentence, however, the "That" is mandatory because, without it, a reader will process "he was sleeping" as a main subject and verb -- and then be at least momentarily stumped by the verb "did not bother." The function of the "That," in other words, is to warn the reader that the coming clause is a subassembly, and not the main S/V/C pattern. (Students, by the way, have problems with such noun clauses used as subjects. I intend to add a discussion on that -- and related problems -- when I have the time.)

Punctuation Marks

     Punctuation marks were developed to help readers quickly chunk appropriate groups of words into syntactic units. The developers of punctuation marks, whoever they were, did not consciously know about all this psycholinguistic stuff, but they did realize that, without some sort of standards for capitalization and punctuation, texts are extremely difficult to read. (Try it some time.) The rules of punctuation, therefore, were not meant simply to be "proper," as in rules of etiquette. They are guides to help the reader process the syntax of a sentence.
     As most of us learned in grade school, periods, question marks, and exclamation points are usually used to indicate the end of a main clause. There are a few exceptions to this, but they should become obvious as you do the exercises. A ", and" ", or" or ", but" indicate that something of the same grammatical type is coming, but the range of expectations is wide. It can range from a simple adjective (the old, but vigorous tree) to entire main clauses.

Dashes are less ambiguous. Although they are occasionally used to set off parenthetical expressions (which we refer to as "interjections") they generally indicate that what is coming is similar to what came before. Syntactically, however, that similarity can be expressed through a range of constructions -- from a main clause to, as in this sentence, a pair of prepositional phrases.

Colons, except when used in salutations of letters ("Dear Madame:"), usually indicate that what is coming are details or examples, thus, the same kind of idea as what preceded the colon.

Semicolons, as noted above, generally indicate that a contrasting idea is coming. Unlike dashes and colons, semicolons also signal the end of a main clause -- and thus a dump to long-term memory. This happens because semicolons have only two purposes (three, if you want to count their use in salutations). In addition to being used to end main clauses, they are used to separate items in a list, when individual items include commas (as in lists of addresses).  Because lists are obviously lists, and because salutations are obviously salutations, a semicolon in any other situation implies the end of a main clause.


Note

Like: Prescriptivists usually claim that "like" is a preposition, not a subordinate conjunction, and that "as" should be used instead of "like" to introduce subordinate clauses. But, as you will see, in spite of the prescriptivists, many people use "like" as a subordinate conjunction.
 


This border is a reproduction of

 Sir Joshua Reynolds'
(English 1723-1792)

 Master Hare
1788, oil on canvas, Musée du Louvre, Paris
Carol Gerten's Fine Art http://metalab.unc.edu/cgfa/

Click here for the directory of my backgrounds based on art.
[For educational use only]