Last Updated June 10, 1999
 


Identifying Subjects and Finite Verbs

     I believe it was Paul Roberts, my favorite grammarian, who said that, for students, learning to identify subjects and verbs is the most difficult aspect of learning about grammar. Once a person knows how to identify subjects and verbs, all the other grammatical concepts can be added to that knowledge relatively easily. For some people, especially for those who have studied a foreign language, the task is easy; for others, it causes some frustration. The way we have been teaching grammar does not help. As I suggest in my proposal for a KISS curriculum, subjects and verbs should be studied thoroughly in grades four and five -- when the writing of students is much simpler and thus subjects and finite verbs are easier to find. But because we are not doing that, I need to address the problem here.
     We need to remember that any normal three-year-old already has an excellent command of subjects and verbs. They all know how to use them, and, for the most part, they use them correctly. Our task here, therefore, is to make that unconscious knowledge conscious. Perhaps the best way to do that is to consider the way most sentences work. Normally, a sentence names something and then says something about whatever has been named:

Our house is at the lake.
She reads difficult books.
He resembles a clown.
We consider the thing named ("house," "She," "He") as the grammatical "subject" for the obvious reason that it is the subject about which the sentence says something. Traditional grammar considers the rest of the sentence as a "predicate" because "to predicate" means "to affirm," "to proclaim," "to assert," or, in other words, to say something about. Because the force of the predication resides in the verb (which traditional grammars also get around to talking about), KISS ignores the concept of predicate and focusses directly on the verb. In identifying subjects and verbs, therefore, you are looking for those things that are being named as the subject (topic) of the sentence and those words that embody the essence of the statement about those subjects.

Find the Verb First

     Different people's minds work differently, and some people seem to find it easiest to identify subjects first and then the verb that goes with them. If you are stumped, try that, but it may be easier to identify verbs first. Several methods for identifying verbs have been proposed. Individually, none of them seem to be successful, but each may help.
     The first is the definition of verbs as words that "show action or state of being." The definition is basically true, but it is probably too vague -- what is meant by "show," and by the even vaguer "state of being"? In

She plays baseball.
"plays" shows action, but in 
She made three excellent plays.
it names what she made. The difference is that in the first example, "plays" predicates action, whereas in the second it answers the question "She made what?" But this means that one must understand the concept of predication, and be able to apply it to a particular sentence, before one can use this part of the definition.
     As for "state of being," I never knew what that meant, and still don't. (And I love philosophy.) Fortunately, the verbs that show state of being are limited in number and almost always (yes, with one exception, gamble on them and underline them twice) used as finite verbs. They should simply be remembered:
is, are, was, were, have, has, had, do, does, did, could, would, shall, should, ought
Note that most of these words are extremely common and you will do yourself a favor by memorizing the small list. A little common sense should help you recognize a few other common finite verbs:
can (when it does not mean the thing)
may (when it does not mean the month)
might (when it does not mean strength)
must (when it does not mean "necessity)
will (when it does not mean desire, or the legal 
      document)
     Suffixes (word endings) help to identify many words as verbs. Click here for more on this

    Another simple way to check to see if a word CAN BE a verb is to use it to fill in simple blanks to make acceptable sentences:

She/They ______.
She/They ______ it.
Generally speaking, only words that can function as verbs will make sense in the blanks, but that does not mean that the word functions as a verb in the sentence you are analyzing.
     Another way of telling if a word can function as a verb is to test whether or not it can have number and tense. Grammatically, "number" refers to the difference between one (singular) and more than one (plural):

He walks.     They walk.

Tense refers to the expression of time relationships:

Past: He walked. He was walking. He did walk.
Present: He walks. He is walking. He does walk.
Future: He will walk. He will be walking.
Suppose, for example, that you were attempting to decide if "time" is a verb in the following sentence:
They time the contest.

In this sentence, you could change "time" to "timed" and still have a meaningful sentence. Thus "time" here functions as a verb. But in the sentence "Do you have the time?" "time" does not function as a verb because you cannot sensibly substitute "timed."
     Perhaps a more helpful guideline is that words that can be verbs do not function as verbs when they are directly preceded by "a," "an," or "the," or by possessives (his, their, Mary's):

They made the play.
She opened a can.
It is Mary's can.
The lawyer read the will.
His will was short.


Verb Phrases

     A verb phrase, in the simplest sense, is a group of verbs that work as a unit:

They were working on the road.
They would be working on the road for a long time.
She is going to go to the store.
He ought to read this book.
Bill has to do his homework.
As we will see in Level Four, verb phrases can be analyzed into smaller pieces, but at Level Two, your primary objective is to identify all the verbs in a phrase as a part of the phrase. Sometimes the words in a phrase are separated from each other:
Would they like to come to supper?
She has often said that they would.
They do, in this case, have to go to court.


What is a finite verb?

     Finite verbs are not easy to define. Perhaps that is why even many experienced English teachers do not know what they are. (Ask some.) The concept, however, is essential because verbs are used in sentences in many different ways. A finite verb is a verb that makes a sentence an acceptable sentence. Verbs used in other ways in sentences are called Verbals. Verbals are the topic of Level Four, so at Level Two your objective should be to find the finite verbs (which you will underline twice) and ignore the verbals. Consider:

1. They went to the zoo to see the monkeys.
2. He likes everything from hunting to fishing.
3. Anthony's driving is dangerous.
4. Hearing his mother call, Paul always went to her.
5. Sent to the store by his mother, he went 
     to the park instead.
Probably the easiest way to distinguish finite verbs from verbals is the simple sentence test. In (1), "went" is a finite verb because it makes a sentence -- "They went to the zoo." "See," however, is not. First, it's got a "to" directly before it -- and thus with it, but most importantly, the "to see" cannot be used to form an acceptable sentence -- They to see the monkeys??? Zoo to see the monkeys??? Nonsense.
     Situations like that in (2) should be easy for you because, if you are using the KISS approach, "hunting" and "fishing" will already be tucked out of the way in the parentheses that mark prepositional phrases. In (3), "driving" is a verb, but it is not finite because the sentence does not mean "Anthony is driving"; it means that his driving -- whenever he drives -- is dangerous. (Here again, meaning is crucial to the KISS approach, but why else would most people want to study grammar?)
     Sentence (4) -- "Hearing his mother call, Paul always went to her." -- includes two verbals. "Hearing" is a verb, but it is not finite. If we ask "Who or what is hearing his mother call?", the answer is "Paul," but "Paul hearing his mother call" is, as you know, not an acceptable sentence. You are expected to use your knowledge of basic sentence structure -- your knowledge of it is just as good as any grammarian's. And it would help you to find -- and then at Level Two, to ignore --  the other verbal in (4). "Call" is a verb, but "His mother call." (unlike "His mother calls.") is not an acceptable sentence.
As always in the KISS approach, you must pay attention to meaning. In (5) -- "Sent to the store by his mother, he went to the park instead. -- you could make an acceptable sentence with "sent": "He sent to the store." But that is not what "sent" means in this sentence. It means "he *was* sent." You cannot add verbs to a phrase to make it finite. Such verbs are verbals, the topic of Level Four.

     The preceding explanation should help you distinguish finite verbs (which we underline twice) from verbals, but remember that you are expected to make mistakes. What you are after is not the kind of knowledge that you can learn and simply store in your brain (such as dates and math tables), but rather a kind of knowledge that you can apply in any sentence that you read or write. That kind of knowledge requires practice. Don't worry if, on the first few exercises you do, you have trouble with the verbals. They will fall into place, but you need to focus on one or two things at a time. In other words, if you are having trouble identifying verbs in general, you will definitely have trouble distinguishing the finite from the verbals.

Note that a finite verb phrase cannot begin with "to." Thus in "Bob went to his room to do his homework," "to do" cannot be a finite verb. One can, however, consider "to" plus a verb as part of a verb phrase if the phrase begins with another verb -- "He wanted to do his homework."



Finding Subjects

     Always work one pattern at a time -- find the verb, find its subject(s), and then find its complement(s). I have seen many students who underline a verb here, another one there, then perhaps a subject from a different pattern somewhere else. Such students never know when they are done, and they almost never do a good job. Work systematically, sentence-by-sentence, one pattern at at time.

     If you find the finite verb first, you can use what they teach in middle and high school to help you find its subject. Unfortunately, most teachers don't give students everything they need. Teachers say, "Find the subject by making a question with 'who' or 'what.'" If the sentence is

Sharon likes hamburgers.
you are supposed to ask the question "Who likes hamburgers?" which will give you the subject -- "Sharon." This works fine for baby sentences, and even for some sophisticated ones. 
     But what happens with:
Some of these concepts are difficult.
We ask the question -- "Who or what are difficult?" And we get the answer -- "concepts." We tell that to the teacher, and we're told that we're wrong. (Thanks a lot.) Actually, this scenario does not happen very often, because most teachers use exercises in grammar books, and the grammar books avoid such sentences in their exercises.
     And there is another problem:
It was the manager who caught the thief.
We ask "Who was the manager?" and we get the correct, if meaningless, "it." We then ask "Who caught the thief?" Obviously it was the manager -- but that's the wrong answer!

     In addition to the "who or what + verb" question, we need two additional rules:

1 If a a verb is outside a prepositional phrase, its subject cannot be inside one. 
In our first example ("Some of these concepts are difficult.") this rule eliminates "concepts" from consideration, and in effect forces you to the only word left, "some," which is the subject. Prepositional phrases between subjects and their verbs are fairly common, so your ability to identify prepositional phrases -- earned at Level One -- will make Level Two easier.
     For practical purposes, if you are working at Level Two, you can ignore anything and everything in prepositional phrases as you look for subjects and verbs. Only one prepositional phrase in two hundred involves subjects and verbs, a percentage so low that it is not worth worrying about until we get to clauses -- where the construction will become clear. (Again, one thing at a time!)
2. The complement of one verb can NEVER function as the subject of another. There are NO exceptions.
This rule, firmly based on our psycholinguistic model of how the human brain processes language,  resolves the second problem. In our example ("It was the manager who caught the thief.") "manager is a predicate noun after "was," so it cannot be the subject of "caught." In most cases, as in this one, you will be left with only one word, usually "who," "which," or "that" which functions as the subject.

A Psycholinguistic Approach to Finding Subjects.

     As suggested at the beginning of this page, the basic sentence pattern is subject / verb / optional complement. We each figured this out for ourselves, as babies, and to this day our brains still expect the same basic pattern. Generally speaking, our brains will take the first noun phrase as the subject of a sentence. As we grew older, however, we mastered a few exceptions. An important one involves words that denote time:

Sunday, we will watch the ballgame.
Sunday is my favorite day of the week.
English uses nouns that denote time as adverbs to indicate when the action of the verb will take place. (This is one of the seven additional constructions explored in Level Five.) As a result, readers/hearers have to wait until further into the sentence before deciding whether or not the time-word is the subject. In the first example, as soon as a reader/hearer perceives "we," "we" is taken as the subject, and "Sunday" is processed as an adverb. But in the second example, the "is" after "Sunday" confirms that "Sunday" is the subject of the sentence.
     As you know by now, after Level One, prepositions never function as nouns. As a result, when readers/hearers perceive a preposition at the beginning of a sentence, they expect the object of that preposition before the subject of the sentence:
{In the winter}, they go sledding.
The initial preposition, in this case "in," devours "winter" such that "winter" is not eligible to be the subject of the sentence. So the next thing named, in this case "they," is. We will learn about a few other grammatical constructions that have this effect. But even without a conscious awareness of those constructions, you may be able to use this rule and your knowledge of English to help you identify subjects -- With the exception of nouns that denote time, the brain will take the first "free" noun or pronoun as the subject of a finite verb. [Questions (Whom do you want?) are an exception to this rule.]

This border presents
Edouard Manet's
(French 1832-1883) 
In the Conservatory
1879 Oil on canvas, State Museum, Berlin, Germany 
Jim's Fine Art Collection   http://www2.iinet.com/art/index.html
[for educational use only]
Click here for the directory of my backgrounds based on art.